the receipts in 1890
were
arly
$16,000 & the Revised Estimated
Receipts in 1891
$49
Doubtless there
were
only
may
their
be signs of returning prosperity, but
ght not to look
we
aught
$100,000
A were a
if it we
a
a
L
certainity, & Even
certainty, it receipts
this kind (which
ane
properly
Capital & not ducome) ought not rashly to be swallowed up unimediatt. I think therefor that the Estimates of Expenditure which have been
to use of the gear's Framed
Revenue
So an
A
the remaining
well as the reme
Balances must be cut down by
such Worker
portfrequired)
not
ae. a
urgently required) to the extent
of nearly $200,
Purning
par.
000
to Expenditure
Weinay prove that 3 Chinese provided for Paned
small increase &
the Porter?
Teachers are
Cadets,
I when there are now only live, but perhaps another Cadet will fans during Augear
10.
Losse Opin
$120,00
Possible Corrundend 80,2
Total from
Fit
In Audit vote has been divided the ilus into itrum, instead of being
voted
are w
a.o
with
145
aswallarto
the practice
a a
Suom.
We should draw
that.
A.0. attention to this, saging
161
Lord Huntsford
presumes there will be no serions objection to their • Hother part of ther C.da. G., Halthough it is contrary &the intention
Your despa
in other Col. 87cb. 1890, Enc. in
where this
letter to 4.0.
Audit system of same date (on 1980/90): prevails
par. 7 Treasury
It was
micreased alread Castgear
? Say
that
Q
W. Madar leas
than
been promoted the supposed necessity for increasing pay of the 3rd Clark does not arise, & approve suggesting to at
I suggest that ith of par. to put it on incremental scale, fem $900 to $1050
End
a gear
but leave hitre 3/850
De another temnative-rate if he
aslight
thinks better; and approv
ہے
That
the proposed increments $5.0 a year from $450 to 7p780 Im the 5th of the Clarks observing
Of thisgested a quicker
in 2405, the higgested
A
rate of increment, viz. $120. gear (which does not seem so
ther $50 increment.)
deniable as
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.